Eq5 vs heq5. One seems smaller (EQM35) but newer drive mechanics.

Eq5 vs heq5 I plan to do planetary, lunar and dso's imaging. 00 (12) Add to Sky-Watcher EQ6 vs EQ5. Mounts & Tripods. Like the older EQ6/HEQ5, these are good solid mounts with excellent goto accuracy and low PE. The heq5 is a big heavy but can carry more load and is compatible with ascom. 3 OTA with my GPDX. I found lifting the EQ6 head onto the tripod rather daunting but the HEQ5 seems to me easier to handle. The HEQ5 is very substantial for even the checked luggage, but certainly doable. For me, I would go with the AZ-EQ5, and Compare Sky-Watcher EQ6-R vs Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ6 vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation More, the competition should take place at low latitudes, where the AZEQ5 needs its native mini-pier and the HEQ5 needs a pier-extension . Understanding the intricacies of this mount is critical because its performance directly influences the quality of your Compare Meade LX85 vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Celestron Advanced VX Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation The HEQ5 is a better mount than the EQ5 so no contest there. Dark Sky Lover Sky-Watcher EQM-35 Pro vs EQ5-Pro - posted in Mounts: Hard choice. Russ, normally its the CG5 and EQ5 that get compared, not the HEQ5. Im currently using a eq5 with 200p, canon 1000d an am planning on getting a qhy5 mono for guiding soon. I want to upgrade my EQ5 with motors of some kind, and cant really get a budget to allow the HEQ5 / or EQ6 pro's so would the goto upgrade or dual axis motors end up - all things considered - the better addition to my set-up, looking at accuracy reliability etc. If you plug a Synscan GOTO handset into a HEQ5 Syntrek it becomes a HEQ5 PRO. You Pay: $1,059. ioptron CEM26? The HEQ5 is far the heaviest of the bunch but needs a half-pier to cover very low latitudes (important for me). It's a great mount - I EQ1, EQ3-2, EQ5, HEQ5 Tous ces noms de montures équatoriales vous sont familiers. e. The complaints about the CEM26 seems to be swayed by inexperience, or excessive expectations. Abitofsense On the EQM-35 vs HEQ5 - I'd personally be more inclined towards the EQM-35, mainly as a mount that could take my scope and camera (albeit right near the limit of imaging payload) but also because of the option to split it down into a star tracker mode for use with my camera/lenses as a replacement to my star adventurer mini. HEQ5, on the other hand, actually has more to do with the venerable EQ6 rather than EQ5. This telescope mount includes the SynScan system, which offers the user a hand controller to select and track various objects in the night sky. However if you are also looking at an explorer 200 for imaging, then get the PDS version. However, the HEQ5 mount may not be the best choice once you add a guidescope, camera(s), and mounting hardware. Im a newbie interested in starting some AP, but primarily looking to upgrade for visual. The 130PDS is also a far better telescope than the 150/1400 you currently have (also sold under various brand names on ebay) so I doubt you would miss it. TLDR redcat51 bad at60 or at72 better (and cheaper) and both eq5 and eq6 are good, just depends on how far you think you will go as the eq6 payload capacity is very good for most amateur setups, The AZ-EQ5 is available in both the pier type AZ-EQ5 GT-P and the tripod type AZ-EQ5 GT-T. Vx has all star polar alignment. For me, I would go with the AZ-EQ5, and My question is, is the payload of AZ-EQ5 OR 6 exactly the same as skywatcher said(15kg/20 kg)? I have both HEQ5 and AZEQ6; AZEQ6 is sturdier and seems to have more horsepower too. Anyone chime in here? This is again, for an 8 SCT and a 4 100ED F/9. It's not so much the physical size differences but the increase in mass that hits you as you step up a level. CEM26 I think it comes down to personal preference. The latter two appear to be the same apart from the handset. Link to comment Share on other sites. I love the ability to switch between AZ and EQ - use AZ for visual, and EQ for imaging. Right now I am just shooting with a Rokinon 135 on a Star Adventurer. Heq5 or eq6r - posted in Mounts: For now my telescope is 200/1000 on eq5, when I bought it everybody told that Im not gonna get good results with it but I managed. Actually bought the EQ5 after the HEQ5 as the HEQ5 was so damn big. Where the AVX states "improved" I'm wondering if this also means in the noise department - the nickname for the CG5 is the coffee grinder because that's what it sound like when slewing at full speed; Difference is fairly big. Posted October 25, 2011. Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ5 GoTo Astronomy Mount is a crucial piece of equipment for every astrophotography and observational astronomy enthusiast. My new gear will be primarily for imaging still, but with a max focal length of 900mm (APO refractor), sampling at ~1. There is also a version with RA motor only, which I have, but it would be useful to have both slow motions on the handset. SKU: 131557 Category: Cables Tags: cable, EQDir, rj45, usb. The HEQ5-Pro is not that much out of budget but I'm not an expert so I'd rather get something more affordable. Instant Savings I may have misread, but I'm not sure Pete was asking about the HEQ5 Pro. I really wanted a mount I could take places and really the HEQ5 is just too much for easy transport. My budget is flexible, I could spend up to $10k but I would prefer to stay around or below $4k (USD). Installed between the tripod and the mount head, this heavy-duty metal tube adds about 16" in height to the assembly while maintaining the stability of Here is a pic of an HEQ5 and an EQ5 which might be a little help. If you haven't already bought the EQ5, I would strongly recommend you spend the extra ~€300 and get a HEQ5. For me, I would go with the AZ-EQ5, and The HEQ5 Pro of course has an autoguide port, so a guide camera can interface with it, and you can control most guide cameras with PHD2 (“Push Here Dummy”) on most laptops. Capable of aligning in either Alt-Az for casual observing, equatorial for serious astrophotography, o This is my last gathering on info on which mount to buy, The avx or heq5 When I checked the avx many people said their mounts were not functioning properly. EQM35 vs HEQ5 vs Advanced VX - posted in Equipment (No astrophotography): I have a Celestron 8se (my first decent scope) with the standard alt/az mount and Im looking for something with a bit better tracking (still using that OTA and perhaps a bigger reflector sometime in the future), Ill be putting my Canon T3i on it for AP and maybe eventually switch over to a Considering that currently SkyWatcher has their AZ-EQ5 (which has belt drives and a direct USB port on the mount) on sale for $1650 USD and the HEQ5 is Log in Register. The EQ5 comes in a goto flavour n HEQ5 is more precise in tracking and has more powerful stepper motors (0. HEQ5 - posted in Mounts: Hey guys, Im going to be in the market for an entire AP setup in most likely April/May. Posted November 28, 2017. 287642" per step for EQ5 vs 0. The EQ5 and HEQ5 use quieter stepper motors, where both the Celstron mounts use servo motors. My payload, with guidescope, camera and dew shield is nearer 7kg so I would echo the advice to either go for a lighter scope or save pennies for an Heq5 or an AVX. Exos-2 is just a modified EQ5 class. I do not recall the heq5 costing 1500 eur and the eq6r 2000 eur a couple of years ago. Sky-Watcher HEQ5 GoTo Telescope Mount PROS. The AZ-EQ5 is available in both the pier type AZ-EQ5 GT-P and the tripod type AZ-EQ5 GT-T. the EQ5. GEM28 vs HEQ5 pro - posted in Mounts: Hi There, Im going to buy my first eq mount . The advantage of the EQ5 is that you have the hand controller to locate objects should you wish to use the goto functionality, you'll need to use a computer of some description and EQMOD to do the same with the hEQ5. So now Im watching at heq5 or eq6r, some people tell me to buy eq6r, some say that heq5 will be good too, even owner of heq5 It appears that eq5 was doing a better job at tracking than the heq5. There the 6" Newtonian beats any small refractors. The EQ5 Pro looks to be more lightweight and, IIRC, the maximum quoted payload is about half that of the HEQ5 versions (9kg vs. For me, I would go with the AZ-EQ5, and So if the HEQ5 upgrade is as good and I suspect it is, then it's worth it. Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro Equatorial GoTo Mount with Tripod Kit . btw, FLO is selling a The Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Pro GoTo Equatorial Mount is a powerful and precise instrument for astronomy enthusiasts and astrophotographers. It is also probably cheaper-easier serviceable if things go wrong OTAs: Right now my heavy kit consists of a 105mm triplet, reducer, heavy Moravian G3 I liked my AZ-EQ5, but moved it on to fund a larger mount. OTOH: the exos2 or an EQ5 is "cheap", in case any harm comes on that checked luggage, I am reluctant to risk my main mount. Really good tracking with a real payload capacity of 10 kg. White and red options are shown. AKB. 00 (2) Add to Cart View Cart. Ça tombe bien ! On va voir I also know the HEQ5 quite well. Compare Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher EQ6-R vs Sky-Watcher EQM-35 Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation Just getting use to this great equatorial mount after using a Skywatcher Discovery Alt Az mount for 18 months. iOptron iEQ30 Pro EQ GoTo Mount with 2" Tripod . I have the az eq5gt and it is an excellent mount. Also more future proof than the EQ5. If you can afford it go for the HEQ5 without HEQ5 is the minimum we recommend for AP. Price: $1,475. EQDirRJ45 EQDir USB PC Interface Cable 3m for SkyWatcher EQ5 HEQ5 EQ3 EQ8 AZ-EQ6 AZ-EQ3 AZ-EQ5 EQ6R-PRO EQ8 and Orion EQ-G mounts $ 29. Steve vlaiv. Et surtout comment bien choisir votre monture. After looking around here and talking to people, I still cannot clearly decide. The regular HEQ5 can be upgraded to full PRO spec using the optional Synscan PRO GOTO Upgrade kit. You Pay: $1,249. Ive seen posts from owners of these mounts and praising in general their experience their own mount. Systems seen were EQ5+72ED+DSLR+Flattener. Technically, neither the EQ5 pro nor EQM35pro are photographic mounts without making huge sacrifices and suffering a lot of frustration. Both the HEQ5 & AZ-EQ5 are decent mounts and either will serve you well. By newman October 25, 2011 in Discussions - Mounts. I own a EQM35 and it is the mount which surprises me very often. I love the EQM35 and use it for mobile astrophotography. Sky-Watcher EQ5 vs HEQ5 (non-GOTO) - posted in Mounts: Does the HEQ5 have significant advantages over the EQ5 that justify its much higher price? The EQ5 uses external motors and there are different options to chooce from, compared to the HEQ5 that comes with internal motors. For the scope, Ive decided to go for a Celestron EdgeHD 8 for now. I have the Atlas AZ/EQ6 which is the big brother to the EQ5 version. Members; 11,501 13,389 Location: Novi Sad, Serbia; Posted April 18 I guess the EQ5 installation is easier than than the EQ6? I seem to recall striping the EQ6 right down just to get the belts in. How do you plan But imaging through a telescope will definitely be a problem. Ive settled on a SkyWatcher Black Diamond ED100 OTA with a HEQ5 Pro mount. Instant Savings-$226. HEQ5 vs EQ6-R . The cost from the other side is significantly higher for the AM5 for sure. Ive been looking at the Sky-Watcher HEQ5, but it seems to be out of stock just about everywhere. I've got the HEQ5 and the belt mod is on my radar, but to be honest I don't have noise issues and my guiding is good - I suspect this is because I spent a good while adjusting the backlash, especially getting the drive gears well adjusted. If you can afford it go for the HEQ5 without question. The other (EQ5) seems heftier, but older mechanics. I am looking at price range Regarding the HEQ5 vs. 00 (18) notify when in stock View Cart. I am using a ZWO ASI183MC Pro and a ASI120MM Mini on I am upgrading my travel mount, with the following criteria: - 8kg photography payload (105/735 refractor, reducer, heavy Moravian camera) - can work at the Equator - reasonable wind resistance - reliable workhorse - second hand, budget ~£800 So far I shortlisted 3 candidates. I'd suggest, if you can afford it, get a heavier HEQ5 or GPD2. The big difference other than the AZ function is the addition of belt drives. It provides high-precision tracking and has built-in autoguider ports. Sky-Watcher EQM-35 EQ GoTo Mount Head . I am currently looking at both the Celestron Advanced VX and the Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Pro. Advice on first goto mount: CEM26 vs HEQ-5 - posted in Mounts: I have been using Skyguider Pro (SGP) with some success for the past few years. 4 arcsec/pixel? The choice of HEQ5 mounts has recently been simplified as only the HEQ5 Synscan pro is now being imported. Well done though Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher EQM-35 . USB adapter for EQ5 HEQ5 EQ3 EQ8 AZ-EQ6 Skywatcher and Orion Sirius EQ-G mounts. You Pay: $725. HEQ5 vs GEM28 - posted in Mounts: So Im looking at a replacement for my AVX as a lightweight mount and am leaning towards either a HEQ5 or GEM28 and was wondering if anyone had any experience with both mounts and what their impressions were. I currently use a SWSA2i. I have the EQ5 and I have seen good AP done with the EQ5, and a similar scope to yours - 72mm. HEQ5 Pro on the other hand is rated for 11kg imaging, 18kg visual. You're not changing for that to increase the payload (or only in a minimal part). Many thanks Can't comment on the HEQ5, but yes the AZ EQ5 can be manually moved both powered and unpowered by releasing the clutches. High payload capacity; Smooth and precise tracking; Versatile and compatible ; Sturdy and reliable construction ; Easy to set up and use; Both the EQ5 and EQM that I found are powered so that helps with exposure time. Equipment Hi Everyone, I'm putting together my first AP setup. Not a massive difference is tracking accuracy though, given you stay within both mounts capacity. However, nowadays, I used the 120 f8. CEM25 Vs. Basically: CG5 has 2" tri-pod legs, uses servo motors (make a noise on fast slewing), 10kg payload. Add The EQ5, CG-5, LX70, SPDX, etc are all in the "EQ5 class" of mounts. AZ-EQ5 on the pier-tripod (GT-P variant) HEQ5. I Thinking of buying a Sky-Watcher astrophotography mount? Not sure whether to get the HEQ5 Pro or the EQ6-R Pro? This video will help you decide. My options are heq5 and advance vx. The imaging rig needs to be transported to a dark site by car. Thanks in advanceJeff I liked my AZ-EQ5, but moved it on to fund a larger mount. Equipment. Print Email . They say the advantage of the pier is that it folds up to a much more compact package for transport and that it works at latitudes 0-90 degrees, whereas the tripod version only works south or north of 28 degrees. Personally I wouldn’t mount a larger than a 100APO to any of those mounts. AZ-EQ5 or EQ6? - posted in Mounts: Hey guys, Currently replacing basically all of my gear after giving up on high resolution imaging. In the case of a problem, the motors on the EQ5 could be replaced easily. id obviously prefer to get the NEQ6 but my question is is it worth the extra few hundred punds and the CG5 vs EQ5. I know you are not able to get like 5 min long exposures with an EQ5 but for me (without enough money for an HEQ5) these mounts seem You'll need a dedicated cable for the HEQ5 iirc. Cookies allow us to do things like remember Comparing Sky-Watcher EQ6-R vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 . Exos2-gt or Heq5, which to keep - posted in Mounts: I have a dilemma. After recently upgrading with the ASIAir and autoguiding (ASImini120), I feel Im pushing the limits of my SGP. Ill most likely be getting the Altair Astro 72ED-R, paired with an Altair Astro 50mm guide scope, so both of these mounts will be The EQ5/HEQ5 extension tube extends the height of the EQ5 and HEQ5 mount so it is easier for observer to look into a long refractor. It is specially designed for obse Having owned an AZ-EQ5 myself with the GT81, I can say that the AM5+tripod+no counterweights is significantly lighter than the EQ5+tripod+counterweight. However I believe the Skywatcher version (Japan like Vixen is) has "real" bearings in the axis' instead of sleeve/nylon bearings. Some added guide scope but after that you are loading the mount up. I am planning to get a Goto mount to really use the power of autoguiding and ASIair. Mais vous ignorez quelles sont leurs différences. Advance vs mount vs HEQ5 - posted in Mounts: Hello all can youll help me to choose the right mount for astrophotography. Create new. Rob. Versatile, Lightweight, and Astonishingly Accurate The AZ-EQ5 hybrid mount epitomizes Sky-Watcher’s commitment to innovation. Similar to how AZ-EQ5 is to AZ-EQ6. Right now, my only scope is a 60mm refractor, but later I may want to Compare Sky-Watcher EQM-35 vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ5 vs Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation Bresser (ES) EXOS2 GT v The EQ5 Pro - posted in Mounts: So Im looking to pitch the Bresser (ES) EXOS2 GT v The EQ5 Pro for carrying my AR127 L. They are not the same price (as far as I can find). Portability is a concern for me as I will have to travel to darker skies (Live in bortle 9 ). Almost there Similar price, similar theoretical payload. Hey all,I have recently taken delivery of a celestron c6s xlt, I would like to know whether a eq5 synscan would track as accurately as an heq5 syntrek, the weight of all the gear will be about 5kg. Guiding was instantly better because the gears on the HEQ5 are better gears with a higher ratio and this mount supports the I have been researching on new mounts for my use and I must say I am pretty much sold on the HEQ5 with belt mod that hits the sweet spot price vs weight vs performance Don’t know how it compares in performance to the HEQ5. I have found the tracking fantastic and PhD2 guiding which saves me a lot of lost integration time compared to trying to do this on an Alt Az mount that needs a lot of attention during the image acquisition process. After selling my EQ5 Pro mount and before my finances allow me to grab either HEQ5 Pro or NEQ6 Pro mount I am reading all the reviews I can to make a better opinion of what mount is better suited for me. I've heard a lot about the HEQ5 but not so much about the GEM28. By Rob January 10, 2010 in Discussions - Mounts. Which mount would you prefer for imaging ,HEQ5 versus Celestron Advanced VX Mount. Decision is hard on these two: The HEQ5 is heavy but weight also gives stability. The AZ-EQ5GT is a new product and, on paper, The AZ EQ5 pro will track in both AZ and EQ, the EQ mode for Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher EQM-35 vs Sky-Watcher Print Email . With eq5 I was able to easily get 30 sec exposures where with heq5 and 30 sec exposures there are evident star trails. As well as our reference mounts our customers send us regular data, so not is this only independent, they paid to find out how good their mounts are improved, and they usually had data before and after so here it is as an average in a table. :grin: I could and can move the HEQ5, the weight is not an issue, but the thought of doing so puts me off half the time so it stays inside and I do as well. I am using a 6 Newt, Orion XLT-150 and a DSLR shooting DSOs. Reviews are mostly favorable for the CEM26, there are a few complaints, but they are sporadic and inconsistent. The payload is the same to the EQ5 but you can set up the maximum load capacity to the EQM35 with no impact on the guiding acuracy. We use cookies to improve your web browsing experience, enhance site security, and for marketing and promotional purposes. The Heq5 came in a few days ago. In the end I went with the HEQ5 because of the big user community. That being said, I am trying to avoid the beginner trap of buying all the things and then having to learn how to use them all at once. Posted December 18, 2017. newman. Sky-Watcher HEQ5 GoTo Equatorial Mount with Tripod . Add to cart. The HEQ5 Pro's sturdy equatorial mount and high-quality gears provide stability and smooth Comparing iOptron GEM28 vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 . Going with a short refractor and a mid-ranged motorized mount. Truth be told I am closer to the HEQ5 pro, i dont think i can justify the cost for someone just going into the hobby, however I would like a second opinion, since covid has increased and distorted prices a lot in astronomy gear. I am now trying to find the best reasonnable mount for it. The belt vs gear drive won't make any real difference for naked eye observing. It was supposed to be a Demo model but appeared more than lightly used and was faulty, so it was returned. I've not had anything heavier on it than an ed80 for imaging, but it handles an Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ5 vs Sky-Watcher Print Email . The HEQ5 is easy to get, currently see 4-5 offers in the UK, quite heavy though. Today the Exos2 showed up my door. 5 arcsec error, while the heq5(with the belt upgrade) has an average rms of 0. Pier or regular HEQ5? Which one would be more solid? Which one would raise the mount higher? I am also seeing on webpage that there is an optional 15cm extension tube, that's nice. The refractor's OTA is very long and will exaggerate vibration and flex. EQ5 can be purchased as manual mount and retrofitted with RA/DEC drives (even single tracking drive) - HEQ5 was powered version "from the beginning" (it was designed that way). August 2, 2023 #1 Tracy. I would surely go with the white one. So, eager to try out new things, I assembled a whole different set of gears: - Redcat 51 II f4. Advanced VX vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Pro - posted in Mounts: Hi, I am wanting to upgrade from my CG-4 to a tracking mount. Part Alt-Az mount, part German equatorial, the AZ-EQ5 is Sky-Watcher’s most versatile mount. Manual Equatorial Mount - SVP vs EXOS2/EQ5 - posted in Mounts: Hi - for a budget manual EQ mount anyone has an idea / feedback which one to go for? My shortlist below: 1. Celestron Advanced VX GoTo German Equatorial Mount . More sharing options Archived. By palebluedot May 2, 2011 in Discussions - Mounts. It's much better to switch the whole thing for an EQ5 with the sturdier mount as well as the tripod. Add to Wish List Item in Wish List . 5-1. I have both, which one do I keep? AFAIK, the NEQ5 is the same as the EQ5. They are similarly priced with similar payload capacity and both within his reasonable budget. HEQ5 uses precision stepper motors, has a higher payload capability of 18kg. The mount would be supporting a ED80 DS PRO,SW reducer plus adapter, Atik314+ , guiding with ST 80 plus Starlight CO Star autofinder. I'm looking to get a true equatorial mount to use with my 6SE and eventually get a new OTA to use with it. Have both but not going to drag them out. If you want a motorized mount (non-GoTO) buy the version with 2 motors. . 143617" per step for HEQ5). Compare Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ5 vs Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ5i vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher EQM-35 Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation HEQ5 VS EQ6-R Pro . Recommended Posts. I liked my AZ-EQ5, but moved it on to fund a larger mount. Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ6 . Page 1 of 2 - Heq5 belt mod in US? - posted in Mounts: Hello, Ive been wanting an EQ mount and have narrowed it to the HEQ5 or EQ6-r. This topic is now archived and is closed So I'm looking to pitch the Bresser EXOS2 GT v The EQ5 Pro for carrying my AR127 L. However recently I came across a very knowledgeable dealer who stocks the mount that I want, but was trying to EQ5 would perform a bit better, but definitely worth making the jump to a HEQ5. The HEQ5 is a bigger mount and more capable, especially if the idea is astrophotography with a 150 PDS. The HEQ5i does seem to be in stock, however. There is no need to go to a HEQ5, I have one here used for my WO 110 frac, which will possibly be his upgrade path, Hello, Does anyone have experience of using both these mounts for imaging? If yes, can you advise on which you think does the best job of accurate tracking and is the az eq5 gt quiet in its native form, i. FLO have the EQ5 pro goto for £486, the HEQ5 syntrek is £111 more at £597. I was really hoping for the eq6 but the heq5 is more portable, but I hear it works better with the belt mod. The HEQ5 on the other hand is superior (So I have heard,dont shootme down ) as it has a higher load capacity and does not sound like a coffee grinder In fairness to MADD, I'm making a new thread. For me, I would go with the AZ-EQ5, and The C8 XLT is a great OTA and would serve you well on DSO's and planetary work. I may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. Members; 27 There's also an increase in accuracy for the HEQ5 Pro vs the standard EQ5. Any experience with the AZ The HEQ5 is a totally different beast to the EQ5, much better mount all round, it is rather more a mini EQ6 than a beefed up EQ5. I believe a newer version is about to arrive here literally any minute so I'll add more on the comparison if I can. Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Equatorial GoTo Mount (16) View Cart. doesn't need a Rowan belt mod? I was going to buy the heq5 pro with belt already installe Page 1 of 2 - Advanced-VX vs HEQ5 Pro - posted in Mounts: Im considering buying one of these two mounts (to pair with a SkyWatcher BDED100), but I cant decide which one. Not really grab and go, more hernia inducing. One seems smaller (EQM35) but newer drive mechanics. GEM28 review -- from a long-time HEQ5 user's perspective - posted in Mounts: Background Ive been a HEQ5 user for around 7 years and I wasnt able to bring it with me for relocation. The Sky-Watcher HEQ5 is a GoTo equatorial telescope mount capable of deep-sky astrophotography. German Equitorial HEQ5 vs AZ-EQ5. Meticulous Mid-Range Machinery Sky-Watcher SynScan mounts have been designed for use by novices and experts alike. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hey all, I have a chance to get an heq5 second hand at a pretty reasonable price but I currently use an eqm35pro so I was wondering if there would be a vast improvement in my imaging capacity? I know there is a larger payload on the heq5 but currently I have stayed using wide Sky-Watcher HEQ5i wifi vs HEQ5 Pro - posted in Mounts: Hey guys, long time listener first time caller. 9, 250mm - Optolong 2inch UVIR cut - QHY268c - GEM28 w/ iPolar 1. one side of says buy a tried and tested mount the heq5, the other get the newer model. I have to buy celestron products from outside my country. Thread starter Tracy; Start date August 2, 2023; Forums. So if I mount a mewlon 180 on the heq5, can it still track well giving round stars when imaging at 0. Page 2 of 2 - Advanced-VX vs HEQ5 Pro - posted in Mounts: 2 years later has anyone changed their mind on Sky-Watcher HEQ5 PRO Go-To vs Celestron Advanced VX Mount ? Excellent question. CEM26 vs HEQ5? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Looking for a more or less transportable mount for photography. I know HEQ5 Pro is a well tested design and lots of people are very happy with it, but Ive also heard that the Advanced-VX mount is a newer design than the HEQ5 Pro and the motors I have heard that the typical RMS of an exos 2gt with pmc8 is about 0. I don't have a problem of paying extra for something that will The heq5 pro was not an easy setup for me as I did not use it very much so never got it setup quickly. But the HEQ5 won't do anything better than the AZ-EQ5 which also has a few advantages over it. What do you recommend? And why? thank you Anyway, his choice was the EQ5 Pro and I mentioned the new EQM-35. The T is $100 cheaper. When I tried using the HEQ5 mount without guiding, its tracking errors resulted in blurred subframes on most scopes with anything longer than 30-45 seconds of exposure. Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher EQ6-R vs Sky-Watcher Print Email . So my I think the CG5 is 'roughly' equivalent to the EQ5 but it has GOTO. And the advantage of the AZ-EQ5 for visual is huge in terms of setup time. The HEQ5 is a totally different beast to the EQ5, much better mount all round, it is rather more a mini EQ6 than a beefed up EQ5. The weight adds up pretty quick and you will be pushing the limit of that mount. These mounts provide extremely high precision tracking and have built in autoguider ports. The HEQ5 is a step above the EQ5 class. 00 (18) EQ6-R vs HEQ5 Pro - posted in Mounts: Im looking to start doing some astrophotography, and Id like to get a decent setup which will last some time. 18kg?). What i would like is if someone who So, apart from the goto, no big improvement vs. Price: $866. The EQ5, even with dual axis motors and even with an autoguider, is not going to give you great results through a telescope. It’s not too expensive, it can carry a variety of instruments, and it performs well enough out of the box that it won’t drive you Compare Sky-Watcher EQM-35 vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs iOptron CEM40 Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation For weight reasons I'm looking towards the HEQ5 rather than the EQ6 and similarly at the AZ-EQ5GT rather than the AZ-EQ6GT. Posted May 2, 2011. Andrewscom sells them both. Vast improvement? Heq5 vs eqm 35 pro. Not related to the question but I really wouldn't recommend that scope, the focal length is unforgiving and if you try and image with it the stars will end with purple halos around them. In this review, we will delve into the features and benefits of this mount, as well as potential drawbacks, to help you make an informed decision before making a purchase. i have a 6inch sct with focal reducer, which will have to do for now, as i know its not ideal for AP. Hi, thanks for the support. I understand that guiding will allow for longer exposures but I The Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Equatorial Head SynScan mount has been designed for use by novices and experts alike. Also there are differences between synscan handsets that are used with Alt/AZ mounts and EQ mounts, so you couldn't take one from your AZ goto and use that on an HEQ5. I have the EQM35 Pro as well as a HEQ5 Pro and use the former solely for my Redcat51. ?I know the bigger mount would make So considering the price of the EQ5 vs EQM, the EQ5 wins hands down. FLO's website lists an EQ5 Pro, HEQ5 Syntrek and HEQ5 Pro. The HEQ5, now this is playing in a completely different class. It will track, but to move it across the sky you have to slacken the clutches. Members; 1,038 6,919 Location: Southampton, UK; Author; Posted November 28, 2017. Cookies allow us to do things like remember Sky-Watcher’s HEQ5 Pro mount is arguably the single best equatorial mount you can buy for astrophotography. Im trying to put together a beginners AP rig. Reply reply More replies. Id decided on the AZ-EQ5 due to the encoders and belt driven RA, but I just want Compare Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Explore Scientific EXOS-2GT vs iOptron CEM26 Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation EQ3 vs EQ5. Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ5 GoTo Mount Amazon $ 1900 Sky-Watcher EQ6 vs HEQ5. But those were just my observations about the CEM26, I don't have one, but I do have the HEQ5. Does the iOptron have any tracking performance advantage over the older HEQ5, or are they about the same? "I get an EQ5 mount, everyone will say I need an EQ6, and then an an EQ8 and then. It's as if HEQ5 is a shrunk version of EQ6, made to fit EQ5's tripod. Difference is big enough that I have an HEQ5 and owing to the size I bought an EQ5. If you want GoTo, buy the complete EQ5 Pro Synscan. HEQ5 offers better weight support than EQ5, making it more stable. You need to add a motor drive kit to it for any AP The HEQ5 is beefier, has a higher payload, and doesn’t need anything extra besides guiding off the bat. Posted January 10, 2010. 5/px. Cookies allow us to do things like remember Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Celestron Advanced VX vs iOptron Print Email . 00. 75 tripod - Guiding: Tough choice, but I also want good old style visual. You do so for the accuracy and consistency of the results. 8 arcsec, and the eq5(onstepped) is capable of imaging at about 0. The Sky-Watcher HEQ5 GoTo Astronomy Mount is a reliable mount that have garnered attention from amateur and professional astronomers alike. orlet I liked my AZ-EQ5, but moved it on to fund a larger mount. To be honest, I don't see why the HEQ5 is such a popular mount-Have you considered the EQM35? hi honestly I do not know The HEQ5 is a good mount for the money. Both help me in different ways. Something like a 130pds would perform much better and costs less. With its advanced GoTo technology, it smoothly locates and tracks celestial objects, allowing for seamless observations of the island universe. Posted April 18, 2017. The iOptron is very nice to set up and with its new balance clutches should be better than the one I have. Last Minute Savings-$141. I came across an unused EQ6 at the right price and did the deal. Total payload will be at most 8kg. I bought an HEQ5 used, it sat in the rear of the car for some time before I plucked up the courage to get it out and carry indoors. I read that you can reduce the backlash by applying high-quality grease to the gears. Even though I got it set up to remote view with the raspberry pi and wireless and wired usb/ethernet and stellerium, I found I spent more time setting up Celestron C8-N 8 reflector which has a CG-5 mount, & the Sky Watcher Explorer 200 EQ5 Reflector which has the EQ5 mount. Seems the belt mod kit is from the UK. HEQ5 or CGEM for EdgeHD astrophotography? - posted in Mounts: Hi!I intend to do astrophotography with my Canon 5DMkII attached to a telescope. " What I mean is - with your 150PL - if you put the EQ3 mount on the EQ5 tripod then you retain the instability of the mount. As a newbie I have never had my hand on either of these mounts and would love some input. This site contains affiliate links to products. If the weight limit is OK for you, the guiding performance of the HEQ5 and EQ6 seems to be indistinguishable. Not sure but do not think one head will fit on the other. I dont wanna stay long with eq5 because with such payload it will die. 00 (32) Add to Cart View Cart. Skywatcher products can be bought from a local dealer. Members; 1,039 6,920 Location: Southampton, UK; After an HEQ5, I nearly dropped my load the first time I heard an EQ5 Class mount at full tilt! The main difference between the Sky-Watcher EQ5 and HEQ5 mounts is the addition of a higher precision polar scope on the HEQ5. The HEQ5's do have problems and that seems to be in the electrical and firmware areas, although most occurances of this are on EQ5's but that could be as they are more common. An 8" newt would be even heavier (typically) than a C8. The Rowan belt mod is really not that difficult but you do need to be I have about a $1500 budget and after days of searching I have narrowed it down to two mounts, the Skywatcher AZ-EQ5 or the EQ6-R Pro. Im pretty sure I know what Im looking to get as far as gear goes, however Im torn between the HEQ5 and the CEM25. I already own the Star Adventurer, and I was headed either on a Heq5 pro or a Gem28. Interestingly the first spec difference seems to Should be mounted on heq5 or eq6 at minimum or even better eq8 for imaging. If an EQ5 is all you can budget for then go for it, but eventually you WILL be looking at a heavier mount, I wish I had bit the bullet and gone HEQ5 straight away. This polar scope allows for more accurate alignment of the mount to the celestial pole, resulting in Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ5 vs Sky-Watcher Print Email . Print Email. I just noticed that the man from Astrobackyard caries his HEQ5 around with a small scope attached: Sky-Watcher HEQ5 pro vs. In the end, for as far as I can see they are both good mounts. Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Celestron Advanced VX vs Print Email . That means that where the EQ5 is pushed beyond its limits with the 150PDS, the HEQ5 gives some headroom. After two months I gave up on the Exos2 and cancelled the order when the Heq5 came in stock and ordered it. It has encoders so that if you manually move it post alignment, it will retain position. While the EQM 35 may have a weight rating sufficient for a visual imaging system, it may be less effective for astrophotography as it may begin to deteriorate in performance at hi all, i really need some advice i want to upgrade my mount but can't decide between the eq5 or eq6, i'll be using it mainly for imaging and when i started saving my money i had my heart set on the eq6 but i've read some review's that the pe is better on the eq5 but the eq6 is better when used w Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs iOptron CEM26 . Quantity. I really like the HEQ5, but recently Ive seen the 8 EdgeHD with the AVX for $500 Comparing Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Celestron Advanced VX vs Celestron Print Email . Sometimes I think they produce a mount like the CEM25P where the P stands for Precision, whereas many would prefer a CEM25R where R stands for Robust. That is what gives it the slightly higher payload capacity, and less strain on the motors. The HEQ5 will support much more weight than the EQ5, so the whole setup will be much more stable. The HEQ5 is bigger and a fair bit heavier. The venerable HEQ5 and NEQ6 are seen as the benchmark EQ mounts upon which all others are judged. This heavy-duty HEQ5 Pro mount is a smaller version of the sturdy EQ6 Pro mount. vlaiv. Both seem to have similar specs, but the Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Pro is a little more Heq5 vs Eq6r, Will the heq5 be enough? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: To start off I am running on a limited budget which makes the heq5 more appealing, but I heard others say to get the eq6r. I have found out that both telescopes are basicly the same, made by the same However for If you plan to upgrade telescopes in the future, get at least the HEQ5 or EQ6R. You Pay: $2,025. currently im having to throw away more than 60% of my frames, so am looking to upgrade my mount and currently am looking at the HEQ5 and the NEQ6. Ordered the Exos2 back in December but it went out of stock right after the order. :eek: I then went and bought an EQ5. The Orion Sirius is the same as the HEQ5. It is a nice lightweight-ish mount and I can recommend it for portable use. It was one of the first mounts I had ever used for astrophotography, and one I still use to this day. What is the difference between EQ5 and HEQ5? HEQ5 comes with a dual-axis motor, whereas EQ5 has a single-axis motor. HEQ5 vs EQ6. Close. I do like the size of the EQ5, also have an HEQ5 and basically too big and too heavy. After watching the online stores it seems that the HEQ5 is finally back in stock. 8 arcsec/pixel. Explorer 200P is fine for visual on an EQ5 or HEQ5 mount. A single axis motor drives only the right ascension axis, and a dual axis I currently have an EQ5, which is right on the limit for imaging (although the foul weather this/last year has put paid to any actual attempts!) and am considering moving up to My first impression of the HEQ5 where that it offered significant advantages over the EQ5 mount. palebluedot. Cookies allow us to do things like remember Skywatcher HEQ5 PRO Same as HEQ5 Syntrek but supplied with a Synscan GOTO handset, not the manual handset. Wondering which tripod to go with. Interestingly the first spec difference seems to be the carry load Compare Sky-Watcher EQ6-R vs Sky-Watcher HEQ5 vs Sky-Watcher AZ-EQ5 vs Sky-Watcher EQM-35 Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation Heq5 or AVX? - posted in Mounts: So ive had a bit of extra cash come my way and am looking to get a new mount for imaging deep sky. The one has more payload capacity, the other is more light-weight etc. I found this curious comparison by Sky at Night Magazine which sums it up that HEQ5 is "bette To that end I decided the EQ5/HEQ5 best suited my needs and bought an HEQ5. EQM 35, which is better? The Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Pro mount is the better option for capturing nighttime images due to its ability to track and maintain stability accurately. bpvpz jkuhzv trgos ghqzf ttse pfftwex khhk buhp parugu zjfk